Skip to main content

Featured Post

Family Time and Changes Galore | Weekly Snapshot

There has been so much going on over here and so much changing soon. I wish I could say I was reading a lot, but it's feeling like a luxury at the moment. 

Family visitLast week, we had my husband's brother and his wife drive down from Boston and stay with us for the week. It had been months since we enjoyed anyone's close companionship for that long so we all enjoyed the time together. We were very sad to say our goodbyes. I hope we can all return to the pre-March era soon. 
While they were here, we celebrated the girl's birthday. (I feel like I have been talking about birthdays on this blog for the past many weeks but we are done for the year! Next birthday is in March.) My daughter had wanted a unicorn cake, and that's exactly what we got, so that made her day. For her birthday present, we wanted to take her to a store and get her a bike but stock is incredibly low. Last week, she had just mastered riding a bike (no training wheels, she went straight from balance …

Review: What the Dead Know by Laura Lippman

Title: What the Dead Know
Author: Laura Lippman
First Published: March 2007
Publisher: William Morrow
Source: Library | This book was referred to me by a friend in a Goodreads group
376 pages




In a nutshell
Two sisters, Sunny and Heather Bethany, ages fifteen and eleven, disappeared from a shopping mall. They never returned, their bodies were never found, no calls for ransom came in. Now, thirty years later, a woman has appeared claiming to be Heather Bethany. She had just been in an accident and in the consequent delirious state, she claims to know something about the disappearance of the Bethany sisters. Soon as she lets that slip, she clams up. Is she just being delusional or telling the truth?

I think...
What the Dead Know has some very vivid characters. I could almost love or hate some of the characters strongly. The woman-in-accident was a vibrant character, who I hated from page one. That's saying something since a major chunk of the book is from her perspective or focuses heavily on her. I do believe that Laura Lippman dressed the woman-in-accident in a persona that will be disliked by the reader, for reasons you will understand on reading the book. That was a clever ploy and served to both giving a convincing touch to the woman-in-accident's claims and also building an initial bias within the reader (Something to be careful about!).

Dave, the father of the two sisters, was a person who insisted on openness and sharing within families. His grief when the girls disappear is so palpable you could feel it through the pages. Till the day he died, he kept hoping for them to turn up. Miriam, his ex-wife and the two girls' mother, gave up on hope instead, so that she could grieve. It was interesting following her life, but for the most part, I was unimpressed. She always struck me as a mild woman. Probably the girls' disappearance changed her, but the hardening of her character didn't really convince me.

Also, am I being bad if I said that I totally disliked the eleven-year old child Heather for her "manipulative"ness?

The prose switches between the present and the past (from the day of the girl's disappearance to the day the father died). The narration of the past introduces way too many details, which I didn't appreciate initially. But once the mystery was solved, what I was especially fascinated by was how many countless chips came together to bring about the disappearance. Now I wouldn't call that coincidence at all, because it wasn't. But there were several ordinary everyday events that one day led to something extra-ordinary. I applaud how these seemingly irrelevant matters were suddenly made significant in the light of the girls' disappearance, without feeling contrived.

When the revelations started coming out, I can't say that I totally bought what happened during the sisters' disappearance. From that point on, it didn't really strike me as convincing. Nevertheless, it was a well-thought out and intricate plot that had me wanting for answers.

That said, I didn't love the book. I found it too wordy and rambling, so much so that at one point I stopped caring about what happened to the characters and just wanted to get to the end of things. That's never a good thing. I usually appreciate the verbose kind of writing, anything that lets me understand the characters and their situations better is always welcome. Somehow, I felt that there was an excessive amount of that in What the Dead Know.

Title Demystified
Till the end of the book or rather near-end, I was in the dark with regards to what this title meant. When someone comes up saying she personally knows something about a thirty-year old case, the biggest challenge is finding eye-witnesses, ALIVE, to corroborate. In this case, they are dead or mentally ill. The eye-witnesses need not be directly connected to the disappearance, they can be witnesses along the thirty-year journey as well. But when all the leads turn to dead-ends, it almost becomes a case where only the dead know what happened. (Luckily for you and me, there was one never-considered witness who saves things for us.)

Cover Art Demystified
I liked this cover, though I can't say I really felt a connection between it and the plot. Going in alive and coming back dead is quite the antithesis of what really happens.

What did you think?
Have you read this book? I'd like to know what you thought about it. Please leave your review link in the comments, or a brief opinion, if you hadn't reviewed it.

Did you like it or you didn't? If you didn't, at what point did the book turn you off.

Did you sign-up for the Glorious giveaway?

Comments

Lisa said…
I felt very much the same way about this one that you did. So much of what happened seemed implausible but I did like the characters.
bermudaonion said…
It's too bad this book wasn't edited better - it sounds like it had potential.
Tales of Whimsy said…
Wordy? Bummer. I hate that :) Great review.
Bookventures said…
Hmmm, this is a first from Laura Lippmann. I have read a few of her books and they all seem to be well edited. Too bad this one didn't make the cut. Thanks for your review though. It was very detailed and honest.

Bookventures Book Club : )
Aw, I'm sorry to hear that! I'm sure I've read some books like that in the past. Great review, though.
Unknown said…
I haven't read any of her books. not sure I will since someone else recently did a review of Life Sentences (I think that's the title) and didn't rate it very highly. Wonderful, thorough, thoughtful review, Aths.
BookQuoter said…
I just fouond your blog. I like it and am passing an award:
http://bookquotes-bookquotes.blogspot.com/2010/05/awards.html
Bibliobabe said…
Great review!
I really like this book until it was revealed what really happened. Being a Mom - I just believe that a daughter would give up her whole life - and her parents - for an accident.
Martha Eskuchen said…
Thanks for the review! I have a book by this author but haven't read it yet. Not sure I'll get to it any time soon.
Athira said…
Lisa, the character sketch was really amazing, I loved the depth that Laura Lippman gave to them.

Kathy, it was definitely a good mystery, I just wish it hadn't been so drawn out.

Juju, very much. That's a bummer to me too.

Bookventures, do not take my word for it. I was badly bugged by the wordiness, but it was recommended to me by a friend who loved it!

Emidy, thanks! :)

Lynne, I doubt I will be reading any more of her books either.

Book Quoter, thanks for the award! :)

Rachelle, that was so improbable right? I was thinking what a waste of a life that was. To give up what you know and love because you made a mistake. It was too harsh.

MarthaE, I doubt I will be getting to any of her books either.
Stew Serendra said…
I think what can possibly add to the great plot of this novel is if a conflict can also be established on the car accident lawyers toronto who happened to investigate the case during its infancy.