Skip to main content

Featured Post

A New Way of Living | Weekly Snapshot

I don't know about you guys but this has been one of the longest weeks ever. With schools closed and work moved to home, this has been a new way of living. When the changes and shutdowns came just before last weekend, there was no time to really process the information. Within days, life had changed. And then on Monday, I reported to work, from my home, with kids also at home. It was when Friday finally rolled along that I felt the gravity of the situation, how we'll be rarely getting out for weeks, if not for months. How schools were likely going to be closed for months. How work still had to be done remotely or worse, there was no work to do anymore due to layoffs or a shutdown. How there was not going to be any dining in restaurants for months.

That was a very sobering thought. I didn't sleep until 1.30am that night.

How are you all doing? What are some of your tips to keep your sanity on while we get through this very difficult time? Some of you are in places that are …

The Sunday Salon: On reading A Game of Thrones

The Sunday

I started reading A Game of Thrones a couple of days ago. This is after watching and loving four seasons of this crazy TV show, and attempting to listen to this audiobook in the car, months ago. I gave up on the audiobook after four hours of painful realization that the book was very slow, compared to the TV show. 4 hours of audiobook just about covered one episode in the show.

When you like a series a lot, whether it is a TV show or a book series, you will remember many details from that series for a long time. This makes it impossibly hard to read or reread it later. That feeling is especially strong with A Game of Thrones because as I read the book this week, I started to wonder whether the pictures in my head were from the TV show or from listening to the audiobook six months back. But once I am past the point where I stopped the audiobook, it should be smoother riding.

Honestly, I am not sure if I want to be on top of the books before the next season starts next year. (So far, the TV show has covered the first three books of the series.) I did that with The Walking Dead - read all the books but two to-date, and now when I watch the show, I'm not sitting as much on the edge of the seat as I did during the last few seasons. That's relieving in one way, because the kind of twists the show creators throw at us can make you scream in agony for days. But the TV show doesn't follow the books strictly - there are some core characters who aren't in the books and there are some big plots that aren't sketched either. *** MILD BOOK SPOILER START*** For instance, tonight's episode is being promoted as heartbreaking and thrilling, and since what's happening currently in the TV show doesn't feature in the books AND the three hospital characters (Daryl, Beth, and Carol) are either not featured or are long gone at this point in the books, I have no freaking clue what's going to happen tonight. *** SPOILER END *** So I will be totally on edge tonight.

The Game of Thrones show is a LOT more thrilling than The Walking Dead. I will even go far as to admit that I like the former show more than the latter. (This is where, like Roxane Gay, I'm going to say that I'm a bad feminist because I really like this show even though women are portrayed often as sex playthings and rapes don't have consequences. There are some really strong women too - it's almost like watching two conflicting tenets in this fictional world.) So one part of me would be okay reading the books ahead, because there are differences between the show version and the books, but the other part would rather read the books after, because I always enjoy the book even if I know most of the story, but I never enjoy the screen format if I had already read the books because I will keep comparing the two. And then, there is something to be said about that edge of the seat feeling - that adrenaline rush when you know something dreadful could happen now, and then that feeling of no going back, because you now wish it didn't happen but it just did and you just have to deal with it.

When do you prefer to do your reading if you wanted to watch the screen version - after watching it or before?


Sam_TinyLibrary said…
I generally prefer to read first, although there are a few exceptions. Most people would disagree with me, but I much prefer the LOTR films to the books.
With Game of Thrones, I'd already finished the books before I started the show, which had me shouting at the screen a few times!
Athira / Aths said…
I prefer the LOTR films too! I somehow struggle with those books - they aren't the most visual books I've read.

For a long time, I've been reading books before watching the movie or TV show version. But I always come off complaining, unless I read the book a long time ago, or I don't really care too much for the book/movie. I didn't really want to read the GoT books because of the time commitment and I wasn't sure if I will be able to even finish one book, much less 5 books. I'm still toying with the idea. I can get very addicted to series, so if that happens, I may end up ripping through the books, so my question will probably be redundant. But who knows how I'll end up liking the books!
Hmmm. I thought I commented here, but I guess I must have shut a window I'm not sure what I said but I'm sure it was profound the first time unlike this time. :)

I think I prefer not reading it and not knowing what's going to happen or in the case of Longmire, which I have read the books, finding that the TV producers mix it up and do things a little differently. That's good too, as long as they don't stray from the author's vision...well, unless the author's vision was...well...poppycock to begin with and they threw that part out and made into it something better.
JoAnn @ Lakeside Musing said…
I haven't watched or read any of it... strange, I know. I usually prefer to read the books first, but have a feeling the only way I can ever catch up here by watching.
I prefer to have read the books before I watch the screen version, but not immediately before. I tend to like the books more than the screen versions, but the best shot a screen version can have with me is for my memory of the book to be a bit fuzzy.
Lisa Sheppard said…
I never can figure out how to do this right. If I read the book first, I do spend a lot of time comparing the two and usually being frustrated. But if I see the movie or tv series first, then I can't get the image of the characters and places out of my head to create my own image.
S.G. Wright said…
I guess with TV shows, I don't mind watching the show before reading it. But with movies I usually like to read the book first. Don't know why. What did you think of The Walking Dead midseason finale? I wrote about it a bit this week over at . Cheers
Alyssa said…
I read the entire ASOIAF book series before discovering the TV series, so I am a little biased. But normally I prefer to read/watch the source material first, then hunt down all adaptations if I like it. That said, the TV adaptation of GoT is exceptionally well made, considering the complexity of the books! (As for the deviations announced for season 5 ... well, we'll see.) Cool post!

Popular posts from this blog

Hell-Heaven by Jhumpa Lahiri (Short Fiction Review)

I first read Jhumpa Lahiri years ago, when her Interpreter of Maladies was making a huge buzz. At the time, I didn't catch any of the buzz, but for some reason, when I saw the book on the shelf at the store I was browsing in, I felt it just might be a decent read. Funnily, I read the entire short story collection without complaining about it, but for some reason, I cannot read any collection anymore without agonizing over its disjoint nature.

I did enjoy Interpreter of Maladies, but I did get bothered by the thread of loneliness and infidelity and distrust that laced through the stories. For that reason, I have been reluctant to read Unaccustomed Earth. However, when I came across Hell-Heaven at the NewYorker - a free short story from her book, I decided to go ahead and read it. I can't resist the pull of stories set in India or featuring Indian characters, and it is that same aspect that hooked me throughout this story.

In Hell-Heaven, the narrator contemplates the relations…

Where'd You Go, Bernadette by Maria Semple

Maybe that’s what religion is, hurling yourself off a cliff and trusting that something bigger will take care of you and carry you to the right place.
Bernadette Fox has a reputation. While her husband and her daughter Bee love her, there's barely anyone else who share the sentiment. Her neighbor Audrey loves to gossip mean things about her with her close friend, Soo-Lin. The other parents of kids at Bee's school look down on Bernadette because she doesn't involve herself in school affairs. Bernadette herself goes out of her way to avoid company.

And then one day, Bee comes home with an excellent report card and asks for her reward - a family trip to Antarctica. The very plan throws Bernadette into a panic but she has no other option. She hires a virtual assistant, based out of India to take care of all her demands, including getting prescriptions at her local pharmacy, doing her online shopping and taking care of some of the logistics of her trip. (It is ridiculous! Bern…

The Lottery by Shirley Jackson (Short Fiction review)

With the Hunger Games hype that engulfed us last week, it was hard to avoid all the discussion of similar works that existed. Of the many titles that I came across, two stood out particularly - a short story called The Lottery and a Japanese novel (and movie) called Battle Royale (which I'm reading right now and just cannot put down). The novel will be fodder for another post, so for now, I just want to rave about the awesomeness that was The Lottery.

In contemporary America, villagers across the country are gathering on the 27th of June (and some a day earlier) for an annual event called the Lottery. Children, women, men, all come to the main square of their village or town, where the lottery master keeps a black box full of paper chips. One of these chips is marked has a special mark on it to identify the winner (the person who draws that chip). Not everyone draws however, but only the head of the family. Husbands are viewed as the head of their families/households, and if the …